|
|
Post by DOT on Aug 12, 2020 23:36:38 GMT -5
I was reading up on red knight some and came upon this sentence in the forum lore.
“ Many clerics multiclass as divine champions, fighters, of monks.”
The monk part was confusing since there is no monk order of red knight that I’m aware, however the way the the sentence was worded, it seemed to read as clerics as a base class can multi class into monks? Though it does not mention “freely”, it still confuses further. Please advise
|
|
|
|
Post by DOT on Aug 13, 2020 13:04:25 GMT -5
Same topic different subreddit,
Cleric domains for red knight are war, protection, and destruction if I’m not mistaken. Destruction domain allows for poison spells, poison seems to be a nono for tempus, but unsure for red knight (even a LE red knight at that). Would it make more sense for dms to substitute destruction domain with knowledge domain for red knight?
|
|
|
|
Post by DOT on Sept 27, 2020 21:15:40 GMT -5
Sorry don’t mean to bother but was wondering if there was a direction on the above queries?
|
|
|
|
Post by Retired DM Dark Herald on Dec 27, 2020 17:33:02 GMT -5
Sorry don’t mean to bother but was wondering if there was a direction on the above queries? I am examining this question and will have an answer for you soon. Sorry for the delay, I just rejoined the team this week  |
|
|
|
Post by DOT on Dec 27, 2020 17:46:40 GMT -5
Sorry don’t mean to bother but was wondering if there was a direction on the above queries? I am examining this question and will have an answer for you soon. Sorry for the delay, I just rejoined the team this week Much appreciated. Welcome back 🙂🤙🏽 |
|
|
|
Post by Retired DM Dark Herald on Dec 27, 2020 23:33:29 GMT -5
I think after examining the Dogma, and more importantly the -types- of worshipers that the Red Knight has, that poison just -feels- wrong for them. I think most people would agree with that. In light of that another domain could potentially be a better idea. Another question is, is it crippling to the build
to simply not take poison associated spells allowed by the destruction domain? I say again though that you have hit on something here and for the Red Knights Divine spellcasters, poison seems wrong.
|
|
|
|
Post by DOT on Dec 28, 2020 0:30:35 GMT -5
I think after examining the Dogma, and more importantly the -types- of worshipers that the Red Knight has, that poison just -feels- wrong for them. I think most people would agree with that. In light of that another domain could potentially be a better idea. Another question is, is it crippling to the build to simply not take poison associated spells allowed by the destruction domain? I say again though that you have hit on something here and for the Red Knights Divine spellcasters, poison seems wrong. Not at all crippling, mostly a curiosity. Perhaps the domains allotted to the deity for frc could be modified to remove destruction as its listed in forum? I think it is currently war/protection/destruction, war/protection/knowledge might be appropriate? |
|
